A California appeals court Oct. 28 upheld a $964,500 verdict for a class of truck drivers at the Port of Oakland, Calif., whose employer had argued that their state-law claims regarding meal- and rest-period violations were preempted by federal law (Godfrey v. Oakland Port Servs. Corp., Cal. Ct. App., A139274, 10/28/14).
The California Court of Appeal, First District, rejected Oakland Port Services Corp.'s argument that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act preempted California’s meal-and-rest-break requirements. Writing for the court, Judge Steven Brick observed that while this action was pending, similar FAAAA preemption arguments were rejected by the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.