The common legal questions and company policies that the workers faced weren’t enough to override differences among their circumstances to justify treating their claims as a class action, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for Fourth Circuit ruled Monday.
“We find substantial variance in the tasks employees performed, when/where those tasks occurred, and the legal standards to which prospective class members are subject,” Judge J. ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
