Wal-Mart Associates Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. sought to add a defense based on recent settlements in other cases involving California’s Private Attorneys General Act. But allowing the “self-proclaimed largest retailer in the world” to amend its answer “would prejudice Plaintiff due to undue delay and the need for additional discovery,” the US District Court for the Southern District of California said.
Named ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.