The Ninth Circuit had never addressed whether patients and insurance companies adequately allege proximate cause under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act when they argue they wouldn’t have paid for a drug if its makers had disclosed a known safety risk.
The court joined the First and Third Circuits in answering the question in the affirmative. The ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.