StarKist Co. failed to defeat claims over its “100% dolphin-safe” marketing, as the Northern District of California said consumers sufficiently alleged they believed the company followed strict standards and no dolphins were harmed in tuna catches.
Warren Gardner and others alleged viable claims under the consumer protection laws of California and five other states, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California said.
Plaintiffs sufficiently allege they believed StarKist set itself to a higher standard than required by federal regulators under the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act, which sets a minimum framework for labeling tuna as “dolphin-safe,” the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.