Twenty-six search engine users were able to adequately allege they suffered a direct injury due to their inability to access “high-quality search products” with increased privacy and less clogged with ads, Judge Rita F. Lin said in an order. Google’s motion to dismiss the consumers’ monopolization claim under Section 2 of the Sherman Act was denied in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.
The plaintiffs say Google uses ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.