Investors say the information technology company didn’t fully disclose how cost-cutting measures would affect its future revenue-generating ability. The lower court correctly dismissed the suit because the investors didn’t raise a strong inference that DXC intentionally sought to mislead them, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit said.
The investors argued that a former DXC executive’s suit against the company—in which he claimed to have warned DXC that ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.