The intervenors, who are plaintiffs in a separate wage suit, texted many potential class members a message saying a “danger” exists that the proposed settlement in Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy Inc. is “not in [their] best interests.”
The message also directs class members to a website, which makes “confusing and misleading” statements about the claims and damages in each case, disparages the Chalian class counsel, and ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
