Roderick Magadia, the lead plaintiff and class representative, lacked standing to bring a meal break claim on behalf of the state because he hadn’t suffered any injury himself, the panel said. And while he had standing to bring his other pay stub claims, they failed because Walmart hadn’t violated the law.
The ruling creates a split between how state and federal courts in California will treat claims ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
