Welcome to This Week in the Circuits, a look at the most significant cases up for argument on appeal.
A NLRB regional director issued a complaint last year accusing Amazon of violating federal labor law by terminating its relationship with a contractor who handled deliveries in Southern California. The complaint—the first formal labor charges involving accusations that Amazon is a joint employer of its delivery drivers—is based off a general counsel’s office finding that the company should be held jointly responsible for drivers operating out of its Palmdale warehouse.
Amazon filed an Election Day 2024 lawsuit aiming to block the NLRB’s case from progressing, arguing that board members and in-house judges have unconstitutional job protections. It is one of 25 lawsuits filed last year that allege some part of the board’s structure violates the US Constitution, an issue that appears destined for the US Supreme Court.
“This insulation of executive officers from presidential oversight is contrary to the constitution, which vests all executive authority in the President of the United States—the head of the executive branch of government who, unlike NLRB Members and ALJs, is directly accountable to the electorate,” Amazon said in its appellant brief.
A federal trial court judge in February rejected Amazon’s request for a preliminary injunction that would bar the NLRB from proceeding while its lawsuit was active, prompting an appeal. At this stage it is unclear whether board officials would proceed with the underlying charges under President
Thursday’s argument may focus more on procedural issues than the merits of the case. The NLRB argued in its brief that the lower court correctly held that a 1932 labor law known as the Norris-LaGuardia Act bars the kind of injunctive relief Amazon is seeking. Docket
Cases to Watch
Mortgage technology company workers who say they got a bad price for their company stock head to the Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday to try and keep their claims in court despite objections from stock plan insiders, who say the now-terminated plan was amended to require arbitration. The case, which drew an amicus brief from the US Labor Department, gives the court a chance to consider a legal doctrine other circuits have used to keep ERISA disputes out of arbitration. Docket
The Sixth Circuit canceled scheduled Wednesday arguments in a records dispute between the IRS and manufacturer
An Eleventh Circuit panel on Wednesday will hear 1-800-Flowers.com Inc. defend its win over claims it infringed Edible IP LLC’s trademarks by buying them as ad keywords from Google and Bing. Docket
— With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.