The plaintiffs, residents of California and Colorado, allege that the banks have colluded since at least 2021 to fix and inflate “prime rates” charged to their most creditworthy customers for short-term loans, according to a proposed class action filed Thursday in the US District Court for the District of Connecticut.
Other defendant banks include
The banks allegedly colluded by setting prime rates at 300 basis points above the federal funds rate, the baseline rate set by the Federal Reserve, the complaint says.
The rates are published by The Wall Street Journal as the Journal’s Prime Rate, which governs the interest rates most consumers pay on their credit cards and home equity loans.
“In a competitive market, charging supracompetitive prices is untenable because customers migrate to banks offering better rates,” the plaintiffs say. “Major banks can charge supracompetitive rates only when they collude to maintain those rates.”
JPMorgan and Bank of America didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
The plaintiffs seek to represent a class defined as all persons who made a payment on a WSJ prime-indexed home equity line of credit during any time since Oct. 16, 2021.
They seek relief under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits agreements that restrain trade.
The plaintiffs are represented by Scott & Scott Attorneys at Law LLP.
The case is Normandin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, D. Conn., No. 3:25-cv-01749, 10/16/25.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.