- Burford loses U.K. court attempt to gain trader identities
- Burford was investigating trading around Muddy Waters report
The litigation funder lost an attempt to force
“On no view is there a clear case of wrongdoing; and there would be a strong likelihood that Burford would find it could not in fact put forward any actual allegation of wrongdoing at all,” Judge Andrew Baker said in his ruling Friday.
The company said it won’t appeal the decision, ending its fightback following the Muddy Waters report last year. The stock is still down 62% since the short seller claimed that Burford manipulated return metrics and misled investors about how it accounts for gains on ongoing litigation.
LSE had highlighted that the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority had also found
In its claim, Burford said that there was “compelling evidence” that its stock was manipulated by “unscrupulous traders.” It said that by refusing to disclose identities, the LSE appeared to be reluctant to take any action that would harm its own interests.
But “without the trading data sought by Burford, it is impossible to prove market manipulation,” the company said.
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Christopher Elser
© 2020 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.