Judges on Connecticut’s highest court repeatedly pressed an attorney for Remington Arms Co. about why advertisements for its AR-15 semiautomatic rifle touted its ability to “single-handedly” overcome “forces of opposition.“
“If it’s used for hunting or for target practice, what’s the purpose of that?” Justice Richard Palmer asked Nov. 14 at a packed hearing in the Connecticut Supreme Court, where families seek to revive a lawsuit against the company over the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre by Adam Lanza using the company’s assault weapon (Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms Int’l, LLC, Conn., No. SC-19832, oral argument 11/14/17).
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.