A bank that modifies a loan without participation by an attorney is not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, the South Carolina Supreme Court held June 19, calling the issue a “novel question” (Crawford v. Central Mortgage Co.); (Warrington v. The Bank of South Carolina).
The ruling by Chief Justice Jean H. Toal involved two cases, both of which concerned borrowers who sought to prevent foreclosure by claiming their loan modifications violated state law.
They said loan modifications amount to law practice because modifications change “the existing terms of the legal rights of the parties” ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.