For the second time in about six months, federal courtsdismissed the bankruptcy case of
US Bankruptcy Judge
“As it stands now, in gauging financial distress, observing smoke may not be enough — one must see flames,” Kaplan wrote.
J&J shares dropped as much as 3.4% in post-market trading following the ruling. The company vowed to appeal Judge Kaplan’s ruling.
“As the Bankruptcy Court urged in its decision, we will continue to work with counsel representing about 60,0000 claimants to pursue a resolution of the talc claims,” Erik Haas, J&J’s worldwide vice president of litigation, said in a statement.
J&J faces as many as 100,000 talc-related claims, many of which have not yet been filed as lawsuits, company lawyers say. Some of the most successful product liability lawyers in the US have sued the company in state and federal courts around the US, winning billions of dollars in damages after jury trials.
‘Corporate Bully’
“It’s a credit to the independence and integrity of our courts that a half-trillion-dollar corporate bully like J&J cannot escape to the bankruptcy court so as to avoid juries,” Moshe Maimon, a lawyer representing talc victims, said Friday in an emailed statement.
J&J has maintained its bankruptcy strategy is designed to fairly and equitably compensate injury claimants, many of whom have lost at trial or will have to wait years before having an opportunity to present their cases to a jury. J&J has denied liability in the lawsuits and has maintained that its talc based products are safe.
Last year Judge
This time, lawyers for victims argued that J&J reduced the maximum amount of money it devoted to settling the cancer claims. Potential payouts in the first bankruptcy would have been backed by a J&J unit was worth about $61.5 billion at the time. After a federal appeals court ordered Kaplan to dismiss the first bankruptcy, the company filed a new case in which it said the maximum it would pay out was $8.9 billion.
J&J “sought the bankruptcy court’s assistance in cramming that bad deal down on cancer victims,” said
Legal Strategy
To try to keep the second bankruptcy alive, J&J tweaked its legal strategy, watered down its support for LTL and cut a deal worth $8.9 billion with some of the lawyers suing the company. That settlement offer has split the law firms into dueling camps, with holdouts arguing that J&J’s new bankruptcy strategy should be thrown out just as the original was.
Although he believed he was compelled to dismiss the Chapter 11 case, Judge Kaplan said he remains troubled by the backlog of lawsuits in the court system that means only a handful of consumers are able to present their cases to juries each year.
“This glacial pace coupled with the undeniable surge in the number of new actions means that the vast majority of claimants will not get the opportunity to seek recovery for years to come, if ever,” Judge Kaplan said.
But the appeals court made it clear that to justify a bankruptcy, a company must face “immediate, imminent and apparent” financial distress, Kaplan said.
Because of that standard, Kaplan, whose courtroom is near J&J’s headquarters in New Brunswick, New Jersey, sided with the holdouts this time.
The new bankruptcy filing is LTL Management LLC,
(Adds reaction from cancer victim lawyer in the seventh paragraph, additional details beginning in eighth.)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Jeremy Hill, Dawn McCarty
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
