Debt Collection Attorney Must Defend ‘Meaningful Review’ of Demand Letter

June 18, 2014, 4:00 AM UTC

An attorney who allegedly signed a debt collection letter without engaging in any “meaningful review” of its contents is unable to jettison claims that his conduct violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, according to a June 10 decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Schreiber v. Sokoloff, E.D.N.Y., 2:13-cv-00935-LDW-WDW, 6/10/14).

Ayala Schreiber brought the suit against Richard Sokoloff after receiving a demand letter bearing Sokoloff’s signature. She claimed that, by signing it without otherwise reviewing its contents, Sokoloff violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §1692 ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn About Bloomberg Law

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.