The
A federal judge in Miami is holding arguments Friday on Capital One’s request to toss out the so-called de-banking suit. The civil complaint was
Capital One argues the suit should be dismissed because Trump’s business has failed to demonstrate that it has any evidence backing its theory about why the accounts were closed a few months after Trump’s first term ended. The bank in court filings has called the claims “threadbare.”
Trump and his supporters have long
The Trump Organization
“While Capital One closes bank accounts occasionally, it does so for legally and regulatorily permissible reasons, and plaintiffs plead no facts to suggest otherwise,” Capital One said in its request to toss the suit.
A ruling may be a bellwether for a similar suit filed by Trump in January against JPMorgan that seeks at least
The suit against Capital One alleges it violated consumer protection laws by canceling the accounts on short notice, forcing the business to quickly move millions of dollars. Capital One contends that its customer agreements allow the bank to close accounts without notice and that it nevertheless gave Trump’s company three months to find new financial services.
Capital One’s cutoff of the Trump Organization came two months after the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol by a mob of Trump supporters, though that incident isn’t mentioned in the complaint. JPMorgan closed Trump’s accounts in February 2021.
The case is Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust v. Capital One, 25-cv-21596, US District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami).
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Steve Stroth
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
