The U.S. Supreme Court risks creating a “mutant version” of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau if the justices elect to fix problems with the bureau’s constitutionality by changing the director’s employment status, a California debt collection firm said.
In its first brief filed Dec. 9 with the Supreme Court, Seila Law LLC said that the CFPB’s single-director leadership structure, which only allows the president to fire the director for cause, is a blatant violation of the Constitution’s separation of powers clause.
The Trump administration and the CFPB’s current director agree with that assessment, but disagree with the remedy proposed by ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
