The U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 30 denied separate petitions by borrowers who said JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Ocwen Loan Servicing took unlawful action against them.
In the JPMorgan case, the justices refused to hear an appeal from a Jan. 30 ruling by the California Court of Appeal against Kirk and Dawn Carmichael, who challenged the constitutionality of Section 437c of the California Code of Civil Procedure (Carmichael v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., U.S., 15-cv-00354, cert. denied 11/30/15).
JPMorgan won a ruling under Section 437c after seeking to cancel documents filed by the Carmichaels that JPMorgan said ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.