“The district court’s legal analysis is brief but materially correct,” the appeals panel said in a Tuesday opinion. “The court’s certification order does not rest on an incorrect legal standard. And we discern no substantive inadequacy or other legal error in the district court’s evidentiary assessment.”
ATM operators sued ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.