Judge Margo K. Brodie of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York in a Monday opinion said the plaintiffs failed to identify any facts that she overlooked in her December 2024 ruling, which determined they lacked antitrust standing and didn’t participate in the market where the alleged anticompetitive conduct occurred.
The plaintiffs’ attempt to repackage the relevant market definition is “unpersuasive,” Brodie ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.