The processors “illegally agreed to share detailed data on grower compensation with one another, with the purpose and effect” of artificially depressing it, the suit says.
They also used a “no poach” agreement—a pledge not to solicit one another’s chicken “growers"—"to insulate themselves from normal competitive pressures that could potentially erode the effects of their information sharing ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.