Financial trading platform
The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in a Wednesday opinion held that investor plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege an unreasonable restraint of trade because they didn’t allege harm to a relevant market.
The case hands a win to Robinhood, which has faced several legal challenges around the “short squeeze” in early 2021, when stocks rose sharply and distressed short positions.
Plaintiffs had alleged ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.