- Appeals court denies request to challenge class-action ruling
- Association warned of ‘death knell’ risk if it goes to trial
The
In a brief
The case centers on claims by current and former Division I student athletes, mostly football and basketball players, that the NCAA violated federal antitrust law by not allowing them compensation for commercial use of their names, images and likenesses — specifically by appearing in TV broadcasts of college tournaments and in video games.
Read More:
The trial is set for January 2025 in Oakland, California, and attorneys for the athletes have said they’re seeking $1.5 billion in damages.
The NCAA had argued to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that because the damages could be tripled to more than $4 billion under antitrust law, the organization faces a “death knell” risk if it goes to trial.
“Any attempt to satisfy even a partial judgment would necessitate curtailing college sports programs across the country, and the size of the claimed damages will put intense pressure on defendants to settle,” attorneys for the NCAA said in a
The NCAA said in November that it disagreed with the ruling allowing class-action status because the circumstances around any individual athlete’s likeness rights are “highly specific.” The association also objected to the plaintiffs’ “inequitable approach to award 96% of damages to men and only 4% to women.”
Representatives of the NCAA didn’t immediately respond after regular business hours to a request for comment.
--With assistance from
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.