The
“The concert ticket industry is broken,” Justice Department lawyer David Dahlquist said in his opening statement. Live Nation “illegally used their monopoly power to help themselves at the expense” of artists, venues and fans.
On Monday, the two sides picked a jury of 12 New Yorkers who will hear evidence about whether Live Nation violated federal and state antitrust laws. If the government prevails, US District Judge
Jonathan Hatch, an attorney for the
Live Nation and Ticketmaster are the largest US venue owner, concert promoter and ticketing company.
Ticketing Services Market
Dahlquist said the company controls 86% of the market for ticketing services to what he calls “major concert venues,” which he defined as a capacity of at least 8,500 people and 10 concerts in a year. The company also controls about 78% of the market for large amphitheaters used by artists, Dahlquist said.
Live Nation’s next closest competitor in the ticketing market is
Dahlquist told the jury that Live Nation has the highest concert ticket fees in the world. He said that when venues switch their ticketing provider away from Ticketmaster fees drop by an average of $3.82. When venues switch to Ticketmaster, fees rise by an average of $4.33.
Read More:
The trial is expected to last up to six weeks and promises to offer a snapshot of some of the biggest power players in the concert business. Live Nation boss
Artists including
David Marriott, a lawyer for Live Nation, will respond to the DOJ and states in his own opening statement.
Live Nation has denied it operates an illegal monopoly even as it has endured nearly two decades of antitrust scrutiny. The company merged with Ticketmaster in 2010 following a lengthy antitrust investigation. At the time, the Justice Department required the combined company to pledge that it wouldn’t tie its services together or retaliate against venues that switched promoters or ticketing operations.
Earlier:
In 2019, the Justice Department alleged that Live Nation had violated that promise and entered into a new settlement imposing an external monitor to ensure compliance and investigate any further disputes. The Biden administration then filed a lawsuit in 2024 seeking to break up the company.
Since the acquisition, “over the past 16 years Live Nation has continued to grow their market power and misuse their market power,” Dahlquist said.
The company also contends that a ruling by Subramanian last month significantly narrowed the case and eliminated the basis for the government to seek a break up. However, the DOJ and states maintain that is still on the table if they succeed in the current trial.
Barclays Center Fight
After opening statements, the initial testimony is expected to focus on a fight between Ticketmaster and
Executives from Barclays and SeatGeek are expected to testify in the first week, along with Live Nation’s Rapino.
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Felix Gillette
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
