- Kroger claims FTC’s in-house case violates the Constitution
- FTC says $24.6 billion grocery deal would increase prices
The FTC, eight states and Washington, DC, challenged the Kroger-Albertsons tie-up in February, suing to block the largest supermarket merger in US history. The agency claimed the merger would drive up grocery prices for American customers.
Kroger, in the Monday filing in federal court in Ohio, claimed the FTC’s case moving through the agency’s in-house administrative law court violates constitutional separation of powers. The company is requesting a preliminary injunction against the FTC proceeding.
Kroger said “private rights — like life, liberty, or property” should be adjudicated only in federal court, citing a recent Supreme Court case.
In that case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, the Supreme Court
The Kroger-Albertsons deal is facing several legal challenges, including a federal court challenge in Oregon, two state lawsuits in Colorado and Washington and the FTC’s administrative trial. A group of consumers unsuccessfully sued over the deal last year.
The merger is on hold until the antitrust lawsuit in Colorado is resolved.
Kroger and Albertsons have argued the $24.6 billion acquisition would help the grocers compete against large retailers like
The FTC said the deal would harm consumers by reducing competition and increase the company’s leverage over workers, slowing wage growth.
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Peter Jeffrey
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.