- Networks, retailers have fought over interchange for decades
- Hearing on deal court approval held in Brooklyn Thursday
A
US District Judge
“My inclination is, and this is how I had started drafting the opinion, is not to accept the settlement,” Brodie said. “I don’t know what an adequate settlement would be but I do know that I’m troubled by this one, and nothing that I’ve heard today has changed my mind that, in fact, this settlement should be approved.”
Retailers have fought for decades to slash their share of the cost for accepting card payments, also known as interchange fees. Much of those fees are passed on to the banks that issue the cards, including giants like
The deal, which was announced in March and subject to court approval, would have let merchants charge consumers extra in transactions involving Visa or Mastercard credit cards. When the agreement was unveiled, the parties said it also would have allowed the use of pricing tactics to steer consumers to lower-cost cards.
“The court’s comments strongly suggest that she won’t accept the settlement,” said
Spokespeople for both Visa and Mastercard said the firms were “disappointed” by the developments.
“We believe the settlement presented a fair resolution of this long-standing dispute, most notably by giving business owners more flexibility in how they manage their card acceptance activities,” a representative for Mastercard said in a statement. “We will pursue our options to ensure a proper resolution of this matter.”
Visa’s spokesperson said that “continued engagement between industry and the merchants is the best way forward.”
Read More:
Swipe fees totaled more than $172 billion last year, according to the Merchants Payments Coalition. Reactions were mixed when the settlement was announced in March, with some coalitions of retailers pledging to take a close look and some quickly opposing it.
Visa shares slipped less than 0.7% in early trading in New York, while Mastercard’s stock was little changed. Both companies’ shares have underperformed the S&P 500 Financials Index so far this year.
“It seems that the judge has yet to make a final decision, but if the settlement is rejected, it may force the parties to go back to the drawing board and elongate a final settlement,”
The Retail Industry Leaders Association, which represents large merchants including
On Thursday, another group praised the judge’s remarks.
“We’re gratified to see that the court recognized how bad this settlement was,” said
(Updates with judge’s comments at hearing in third paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Eichenbaum, Anthony Aarons
© 2024 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.