The plaintiff’s “opaque allegations” are “either insufficient or independently explained by rational business decisions” rather than collusion, Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel wrote Tuesday, saying the suit “fails to provide specific facts” that make its antitrust claims plausible.
The proposed class action, which landed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California after being filed in state ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.