- Google still faces DOJ, state suits over search contracts
- Combined trial over claims set for Sept. 12 in federal court
In a ruling unsealed Friday, US District Judge
Mehta left in place allegations by the Justice Department that Google’s contracts with
The states’ allegation on vertical search “relies not on evidence but almost entirely on the opinion and speculation of its expert,” Mehta wrote. “Simply put, there is no record evidence of anticompetitive harm.”
The case, set for trial in Sept. 12, will now focus on the agreements Google made with companies to set its search engine as the default, which the plaintiffs allege kept rivals such as
Mehta said in Friday’s ruling that he needed to see more evidence on how Google’s agreements with browsers and smartphone manufacturers affected the market before he could decide on their legality.
Google reiterated that consumers have choices online about where to go for information.
“We look forward to showing at trial that promoting and distributing our services is both legal and pro-competitive,”
Google sought to throw out the two antitrust cases brought by the Justice Department and state AGs, which were filed separately in 2020. The suits allege that Google’s deals to ensure its search engine is the default on web browsers and mobile devices violate antitrust laws. Mehta is overseeing both lawsuits.
The cases are US v. Google, 20-cv-03010, and Colorado v. Google, 20-cv-03715, US District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
(Updates with Google comment in seventh and eighth paragraphs.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Elizabeth Wasserman, Peter Jeffrey
© 2023 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.