The U.S. search giant breached competition rules and deserved the penalty doled out by the
“The ruling will make it harder for platforms to favor their own services because they risk infringing competition law as soon as doing so harms a rival,” said Dirk Auer, a professor at Liege University in Belgium. “Unfortunately, this will be detrimental to consumers.”
The commission’s
The court ruling “delivers a clear message that Google’s conduct was unlawful and provides necessary legal clarity,” European Commission spokeswoman
Google will review the ruling closely, it said in an emailed statement. It insisted it has complied fully with the EU order since 2017.
“Our approach has worked successfully for more than three years, generating billions of clicks for more than 700 comparison shopping services,” it said.
While the regulator was largely vindicated in the ruling, judges found that the commission had failed to prove that Google had harmed the market for general search, striking out the EU’s finding of a breach. That leaves the decision solely targeting the shopping-search service.
In a separate ruling on Wednesday judges in the U.K. Supreme Court
A loss for Vestager could have stalled an EU crusade against the powers of tech giants that’s encouraged other global antitrust regulators, including the U.S. and U.K. Draft EU rules in the works may also curb firms favoring their own services.
A company’s actions to make its own services more prominent “involves a certain form of abnormality,” the court said. “A general search engine is infrastructure,” it said, countering a view that Google is free to act as it wishes on its own website.
The result could also sway
The ruling may also help smaller firms to seek millions of dollars in damages in national courts in claims that Google hurt their nascent businesses.
Along with the fine, Google was ordered in 2017 to make
Foundem, a U.K. comparison shopping service that triggered the probe, said the ruling “does not undo the considerable consumer and anti-competitive harm caused by more than a decade” of Google’s behavior. It and
The case is: T-612/17, Google and Alphabet v. Commission.
(Updates withd details of the U.K. suit in the ninth paragraph)
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Chapman
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.