On Thursday morning, Slater was telling confidants in Washington that she intended to move forward with the agency’s work, even as rumors circulated she might be leaving. Just before 11 a.m., she
Slater, who took over as the top antitrust cop less than a year ago, had gotten a call from the White House personnel office, according to people with knowledge of the matter. It was the culmination of months of tensions with more business-friendly factions in the administration, along with the influence of government outsiders like
Davis and other Republicans close to Trump have wielded significant influence over the Justice Department’s antitrust efforts, acting as intermediaries between corporate America and federal enforcers, according to interviews with people close to the agency’s workings. Superiors often wrested control over key decisions from Slater,
Companies including
Davis, who had initially backed Slater’s appointment — he posted a congratulations selfie with her after her Senate confirmation in March — had since fallen out with her and started a campaign to undermine her, the people say. Davis addressed his criticism of Slater directly with Trump in a recent meeting, which accelerated her removal, according to another person.
On Thursday, he posted his response to her departure: “Good riddance.”
Antitrust, which had been one of Washington’s rare areas of bipartisan agreement, has become another arena in Trump’s second term where influence and proximity to power can sway outcomes. While companies have long hired lobbyists to influence Congress, enforcers at the Justice Department and FTC were largely insulated from that kind of advocacy.
Read More:
Antitrust enforcers have traditionally enjoyed “considerable autonomy” from Justice Department leaders and the White House, said
That allows the agency to argue “the professional view of the department is being followed,” said Kovacic, now an antitrust professor at George Washington University Law School. The involvement of lobbyists raises questions about whether “the antitrust analysis counts for anything anymore or is it a sideshow?”
“You can go to the podium and talk about the rule of law,” he said, “but people might laugh at you now.”
This look at Slater’s exit and the tensions that preceded it is based on interviews with more than a dozen lawyers who work within the Justice Department or interact directly with antitrust staff. They asked not to be named discussing internal matters.
Slater, 54, declined to comment. Davis declined to comment on his role in her departure. In an X post late Thursday in response to how their relationship soured, he said he was “eager to tell this story” and that “it won’t end well for Gail.”
The White House referred comment to the Justice Department, which declined to comment beyond a statement released by Attorney General
Pushing Deals Through
US agencies wrapped up just 16 major merger probes in 2025, according to the law firm Dechert. That was the lowest in 15 years, except when dealmaking slowed because of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the first year of Trump’s first term, by contrast, the antitrust agencies finished 27 investigations.
Slater’s boss, associate US Attorney General and former White House lawyer
Trump’s return to the White House has also brought a surge in activity among Republican-aligned lobbyists and lawyers. Jeff Miller, who raised tens of millions of dollars for Trump’s 2024 campaign;
But Davis stands out, because of his close connections to the president and hardball tactics.
An outspoken critic of the Big Tech companies, Davis, 48, previously clerked for US Supreme Court Justice
Davis founded the conservative legal group Article III Project, which advocates for judges friendly to the Trump administration. He is particularly active on X, which suspended him for “hateful conduct” multiple times before
Just this month, he made social media posts implying that Slater leaked confidential informationabout DOJ investigations and referencing the “Irish terrier.” Slater was born in Dublin.
Davis’ role as a fixer started with the very first antitrust case of Trump’s second term.
In January 2025, newly installed Trump officials at the Justice Department signed off on a lawsuit to block HPE’s $14 billion purchase of
HPE responded by assembling a politically connected advisory team, hiring William Levi, a former chief of staff to former Trump Attorney General
Slater, a veteran of Trump’s first administration, was skeptical of the arguments. Davis and Levi then appealed to higher-ranking Justice Department officials who overruled her.
On a Friday night in late June — less than two weeks before the trial was set to begin — the Justice Department announced it had reached a settlement with HPE.
The resulting dustup led to the firing of two of Slater’s deputies and an
Davis has used the HPE settlement as his calling card in talks with other companies pursuing deals, according to people familiar with his presentation. Charging fees climbing into hundreds of thousands of dollars per month, he offers not just arguments to the antitrust department but also the ability to go above Slater to top officials at the Trump Justice Department or the White House, said the people.
Davis said he hasn’t offered end runs around Slater. “It’s unsurprising that Bloomberg wants to run this fake news,” he said.
Compass and
Going around Slater, Davis persuaded more senior Trump officials at the Justice Department to ignore the recommendation for an in-depth merger review, according to people familiar with the probe. Compass and Anywhere closed the deal on Jan. 9, though state reviews of the transaction remain ongoing. Compass didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Davis also is working with Live Nation, whose shares climbed Thursday after news of Slater’s departure. A representative for the company didn’t immediately return a request for comment.
Higher Appeals
Davis is by no means unique in seeking to court powerful figures within the administration.
In late December – weeks after Netflix beat out
It’s not unusual for companies to plead their case to senior DOJ officials, and Slater’s predecessors have all butted heads with their bosses — but that typically occurs later in the process. Netflix’s decision to go above Slater from the beginning underscores how it has become a more standard part of the strategy. Netflix declined to comment.
Woodward, who represented Jan. 6 defendants and the Trump aide indicted for destroying classified documents, is viewed as business-friendly and companies have increasingly sought to appeal to him on investigations. He has pushed to be involved in reviews from their inception, believing settlements can be a speedy resolution. The push for fast settlements frequently put Woodward and Slater at odds.
The signs that Slater was on the outs had been mounting. The Justice Department had approved for her to attend an antitrust meeting hosted by the
Last week, she sought to replace her chief of staff, Sara Matar, borrowed last year from the US Attorney’s office in Washington.
After deciding to end Matar’s detail to the antitrust division on Feb. 6, Slater posted about her departure on X and thanked her for her service. Bondi, however, overruled Slater’s decision.
The post was quickly deleted.
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Kara Wetzel
© 2026 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.