Judge Edward J. Davila dismissed the case from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, rejecting allegations that Cigna sought to fix prices by engaging a third-party “repricer,” Viant Inc., to renegotiate over services it had pledged to reimburse at the “usual and customary” rate.
Westwind Recovery lacks standing to pursue antitrust or racketeering claims against Cigna or Viant “because there are more direct victims of the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.