The proposed $35 billion merger between
The DOJ memo to the
The news marks a change of direction after DOJ antitrust officials had in an interim version of the memo in January under the Biden administration outlined some concerns that the deal could harm competition, the people said.
Staff were divided about whether the DOJ should challenge the tie-up, one of the people said. After hearing from staff, the new antitrust division chief
The January memo outlined concerns about the potential loss of head-to-head competition for first-time credit card holders. Antitrust enforcers were also concerned about the potential for Capital One to use Discover to evade regulatory caps on interchange fees for its debit card business, according to one of the people.
“Our deal with Discover Financial complies with the Bank Merger Act’s legal requirements and we remain well-positioned to gain approval,” Capital One said in a statement.
Discover and the Justice Department declined to comment.
Bank merger reviews at the DOJ are handled somewhat differently than other deals. While the antitrust officials review and advise on competitive factors in a deal, bank regulators take the lead and are the first to make a decision, accounting for issues such as how a merger impacts the safety and soundness of the banking system.
For decades the DOJ evaluated bank mergers almost entirely on the overlap in deposits. During the Biden Administration however, then DOJ antitrust head
The New York Times earlier reported on the decision to clear the merger.
(Updates with more background about the antitrust review from third paragraph.)
--With assistance from
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Ben Bain
© 2025 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.