Despite speculating that Aetna slow-walked reimbursement claims as “part of a broader scheme to penalize out-of-network providers” for refusing “to go in-network,” the lawsuit “is bereft of facts” showing “how Aetna’s supposed conduct actually excluded or is likely to exclude competition,” Judge J. Paul Oetken wrote.
He also threw out all but one of the suit’s claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, saying the ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
Bloomberg Law provides trusted coverage of current events enhanced with legal analysis.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.