A company that caters to catastrophically disabled patients isn’t entitled to a sales tax exemption for certain medical devices, the Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in an opinion released Tuesday.
The company failed to show that the wound-covering materials, absorbent products, and patient care necessities that it sold were exempt prosthetic devices, the court held.
“If a disposable glove is deemed a prosthetic, what item would not fall under such a definition?” Judge Stephen L. Borrello wrote for himself and Judge Christopher M. Trebilcock. “By framing the argument in this way, it becomes clear that plaintiff’s definition stretches the statutory ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Tax or Log In to keep reading:
See Breaking News in Context
From research to software to news, find what you need to stay ahead.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools and resources.
