Ride-hail and delivery drivers are suing to invalidate the California ballot measure approved in November that declared them independent contractors, the latest volley in the state’s years-long struggle over whether gig workers are employees.
The
The measure designates app-based drivers as contractors under state law -- rather than employees entitled to protections like sick pay and worker’s compensation –- though it provides for some alternative benefits. It also prohibits the legislature from making amendments without at least seven-eighths support, including by passing laws letting unions negotiate on behalf of drivers.
The drivers argue that Proposition 22 unconstitutionally usurps the legislature’s authority over worker’s compensation, as well as the judiciary’s authority to dictate what counts as an “amendment” to a ballot measure. They also claim that the measure violates the constitutional requirement that each measure be limited to a single subject.
“If allowed to stand, the ploy will be repeated in other initiatives as an effective means to slip potentially unpopular provisions past the voters,” according to the complaint.
The companies have said drivers prefer contractor status. In an emailed statement on behalf of the industry-backed campaign for Prop. 22, Uber driver Jim Pyatt said: “Meritless lawsuits that seek to undermine the clear democratic will of the people do not stand up to scrutiny in the courts.”
(Updates with comment from driver supporting Prop 22.)
To contact the reporter on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Peter Blumberg, Anthony Lin
© 2021 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
To read more articles log in.
Learn more about a Bloomberg Law subscription.