- The review board said iRobot patent 8,418,303 for a vacuum brush roller wasn’t a new idea, and cited a 1928 patent as part of the case against the Roomba maker
- The board had previously said three other iRobot patents are invalid
- The rulings against iRobot have the effect of “gutting iRobot’s ill-conceived effort to litigate SharkNinja out of the robotic vacuum cleaner market and limit consumer choice,” SharkNinja
said in ...
SharkNinja Knocks Out Another IRobot Vacuum Patent
Oct. 25, 2021, 1:34 PM