Democrats eyeing a permanent extension of the Obamacare subsidies to avoid creating another deadline now say they’re willing to take what they can get to avoid premium increases for 2023 and a rise in the uninsured rate.
Senate Democrats are preparing a partisan bill to direct the federal government to demand lower prices for certain medicines and extend for at least two years expanded premium subsidies for people who get their insurance through the Affordable Care Act’s individual marketplace.
If Congress doesn’t act, and the enhanced premium subsidies from the American Rescue Plan Act expire at the end of 2022, roughly 3 million Americans could lose coverage and become uninsured in 2023, Benjamin Sommers, deputy assistant secretary for health policy at the Department of Health and Human Services, told reporters recently.
And almost 9 million Americans would see their insurance costs increase by more than $400 per person each year, he said. Another 1.5 million would lose their subsidies altogether, which would cost, per person, more than $3,000 annually.
Senate Majority Leader
Democrats, with congressional midterm elections set for November, for months have been warning that allowing expanded ACA premium subsidies to expire would be disastrous politically for them and financially for millions of Americans. However, pushing the deadline back to 2024 would confront Congress with the same problem, but in an election where the White House as well as congressional control are at stake.
“You probably couldn’t have picked a harder year,” Chris Jennings, a long-time health policy adviser for Democrats who worked in the Obama administration during the early years of ACA implementation.
Congress is “not in an environment where there’s some kind of like master plan; that’s not this environment,” Rep.
Underwood noted that Democrats were unable to make significant improvements to the original ACA for a decade until 2021, when—with just Democratic votes—they passed legislation (
Democrats have yet to release text of their ACA subsidy agreement and two Democratic aides cautioned Tuesday that Schumer and Manchin were continuing to discuss the details.
Insurers Warn of Higher Rates
Insurers have been preparing to raise their premiums partly because of this anticipated rise in the uninsured rate, insurance industry researchers warn.
In the District of Columbia and seven states with early rate-filing deadlines - Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington - average proposed rate increases for marketplace coverage in 2023 are “considerably higher than they have been in the last couple of years,” Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy, said in a recent blog.
In DC, for example, early marketplace rate filings show BlueCross and Blue Shield proposed an average rate increase of 29.3% for next year, while Kaiser Permanente has proposed a 17% boost, Corlette found. In Maryland, BCBS is proposing a 25.9% average rate jump next year, compared with 7.2% for Kaiser. And in Michigan, Physician’s Health Plan has proposed a 12.9% increase, while BCBS has proposed a 2.8% reduction in their average rates, Corlette found.
The proposed increases are mainly due to growing cost inflation for hospital and physician services and prescription drugs, along with increased utilization of medical services in 2021, and through the first quarter of 2022 among some carriers, Corlette said.
“Going forward, they’re essentially trying to recoup what they lost” along with projecting continued high utilization in 2023, Corlette added.
Fewer, and Sicker, Enrollees
The higher rate proposals also reflect insurers’ projection of fewer—and sicker—marketplace enrollees next year, if the subsidies lapse. The loss of the subsidies would force more marketplace enrollees to pay a higher share of their premiums with far less financial assistance.
“The assumption is that when premiums go up, healthy people are going to be less likely to want to pay that more expensive premium,” Corlette said.
If Congress passes a Democratic proposal to renew the subsidies for two years, Corlette said, state insurance departments could allow carriers to adjust their rates downward to reflect the renewed financial assistance,
And even though marketplace insurers are used to lots of policy uncertainty, “there may be some carriers that say ‘I don’t want to deal with all this turbulence,’ and pull out altogether,” or cut their marketing, Corlette said.
“Certainty on the rules of the road are really critical, for long-term stability,” she added. “So if the ARPA subsidies are limited to two years, it’s really unfortunate, but certainly better than nothing at all.”
To contact the reporters on this story:
To contact the editors responsible for this story: