The windfall from the pharmaceutical giant’s
The pressure is clearly on for Pfizer to show that the muscle it built during the pandemic won’t atrophy. Big Pharma companies don’t normally double revenue so quickly, and nobody expects that kind of growth to continue. But one thing’s clear: Pfizer can’t go back to the sluggish path it was on for years. Its stock has already fallen 25% in 2022 on fears that might happen, trailing the broader market and other drugmakers.
“Pfizer was boring before Covid,” said BMO Capital Markets Corp. analyst
Before the pandemic, Pfizer was in search of its next big hit after going a few years without launching a new blockbuster. Several of its current mainstays will soon face competition from generics. But a problem that might once have been solved by going shopping could now require a different strategy. The megadeals that Pfizer executives have long used to turbo-charge growth have gotten more expensive and more difficult to complete, with interest rates rising and antitrust fervor in Washington.
That’s a problem for a company that has often relied on deals so big that almost no other company could have pulled them off. When Pfizer paid $90 billion for Warner-Lambert in 2000, for example, one of the trophy assets it collected was cholesterol megahit Lipitor, which sold $13 billion annually at its peak. In a search for blockbusters to bolster the company’s pipeline, successive chief executive officers spent more than $200 billion on deals from 2000 through 2020, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Even before Covid sickened the first person in Wuhan, China, Pfizer’s new CEO
Bourla, who’d risen through the ranks and taken the top job in early 2019, saw an opportunity to make Pfizer into a version of the kind of nimble, innovative biotechnology company that it had more usually acquired. He hived off a large division that included storied-but-off-patent products like Lipitor and erectile-dysfunction pill Viagra, and announced his intention to focus on high-risk, high-reward areas like cancer and rare diseases.
Now, after a two-year-plus detour during which Covid put everything else on the sidelines, Bourla is ready to move on, even if Wall Street is still fixated on the $37 billion that the shot brought in for New York-based Pfizer last year.
“Nobody asked me about how we’re doing with the new products other than Covid,” Bourla said, sounding somewhat exasperated, after an earnings call with Wall Street analysts this summer. Bourla has promised 6% annual revenue growth for the company’s core business — excluding Covid products — through 2025. Wall Street thinks he can get close: analysts expect that number is more likely to be 5%.
There’s no way Pfizer can recreate the conditions that led to this moment. Governments gave companies billions of dollars to speed up Covid vaccine development (Pfizer didn’t take US money, but its vaccine partner
Covid has left a mark on the pharmaceutical business, setting off a surge of enthusiasm for and investment in messenger RNA, the technology behind the vaccines from Pfizer and
To much of the world, the technology that made Pfizer’s Covid vaccine seemed to come out of nowhere. It was actually built on
Building on the success of that vaccine is a central part of Bourla’s own vision for Pfizer. He’s said that he’s “all-in” on mRNA and talked about an abundant pipeline of potential uses for the technology, from a vaccine for flu — which could come to market as soon as next year — to a shot for shingles, cancer treatments and cures for rare genetic diseases. Pfizer has already put some of its capital to work forging alliances with smaller, specialist companies. However, success could take years, and many rivals, including Moderna, are also hard at work on mRNA.
“When Pfizer starts to go after mRNA therapeutics, it’ll find potentially bigger hits, but also more uncertainty,” said
Pfizer wants to bring multiple mRNA products to market within five years — an ambitious timeframe based on how drug development usually works. Therapies can take more than a decade to move from a lab into the human testing that determines whether regulators will approve them. About 90% of drug candidates fail in clinical trials.
That doesn’t mean labs around the country aren’t trying, leading to a fight for scientists.
“Students and trainees are being bombarded,” said
Some 43 private companies working with mRNA technology have raised about $1.6 billion in funding in the past 12 months, according to Pitchbook data. Then there are also the big publicly traded giants like Moderna or BioNTech that are the pioneers in the space.
To compete, Pfizer has been elevating its in-house mRNA experts, including Kathy Fernando, a 44-year-old pharma executive who launched her career studying the technology. In 2006, she completed her PhD dissertation on developing an RNA vaccine for HIV. She later left academia for business consulting and joined Pfizer in 2014.
During the pandemic, Fernando was named Pfizer’s head of mRNA scientific strategy and worldwide R&D operations. “We don’t aim to be the company with the most mRNA programs in our portfolio — we’re more selective,” Fernando said. A lot of the battle is knowing where to start.
Fernando breaks the question into three parts: evaluating technology, biology and manufacturing. “The second and third part — biology and manufacturing — are what differentiates us,” she said. It’s a hint that Pfizer may not lead in technology, but the company can successfully bring a product to market. Pfizer says that of Sept. 4, it’s shipped 3.7 billion doses of its Covid vaccine to 180 countries. Moderna declined to comment on how many doses of its vaccine have been distributed.
Twenty-five miles north of its New York City headquarters, Pfizer is spending almost half a billion dollars to upgrade its Pearl River vaccine R&D campus. The site — 330 acres close to several state parks — is the clearest physical manifestation of the Pfizer that Bourla envisions: home to cutting-edge laboratories and more than 1,000 staff that were pivotal to the development of the Covid shot. The money will be used to expand and update the labs, along with adding some typical corporate perks like a new cafe and a gym.
Pfizer’s also turned to external mRNA advisers to pressure-test its strategy, especially when new products are on the table. Drew Weissman, a University of Pennsylvania professor in vaccine research credited with developing the mRNA technology used in the Covid shots, is among those who’ve been tapped for their guidance. Weismann said Pfizer puts “as many as 30 people together and has them battle out ideas over a one-day or two-day event.”
Pfizer’s rivals are making similar moves, and they’re looking beyond just mRNA at other RNA- and DNA-focused medicines. Drugmaking giant
“It starts with a couple of players, but the technology becomes adopted by all of pharma and eventually becomes one of the pillars of how they make drugs,” Skovronsky said.
Then, of course, there’s Moderna, which trades under the stock ticker MRNA. At its peak, the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company ballooned to a $190 billion market valuation after its Covid shot, Spikevax, hit the market.
“Tell me one industry where disruption has happened by a large incumbent,” he said in an interview at Moderna’s R&D day in Boston in September. “Pfizer did an amazing job getting the product to development and manufacturing scale. We did the same with no help from a Big Pharma company.”
Moderna has other issues with Pfizer. In August, Moderna filed lawsuits in US court in Massachusetts and in Germany, saying it had patented mRNA inventions from 2010 to 2016. It argues that Pfizer and BioNTech copied some of Moderna’s technology instead of devising their own.
A spokeswoman for Pfizer said the vaccine was based on BioNTech’s proprietary mRNA technology and that the company is confident in the intellectual property supporting the shot and will defend itself against the allegations of the lawsuit.
Beyond the fight with Moderna, there are questions around how much further Pfizer can get in mRNA without relying on the partner that helped it develop the vaccine in the first place.
“Pfizer is now the largest manufacturer of RNA vaccines in the world,” said Weissman, the UPenn professor. “But they were reliant on BioNTech for that knowledge of the platform.”
Bourla has been trying to change the perception that Pfizer needs BioNTech to advance its mRNA strategy. “We don’t need to work with them,’’ he said in an interview in early 2021, describing it as a “fantastic partnership,” but one that wouldn’t prevent the company from charting its own course.
So far, Pfizer says it’s spent more than $2 billion on mRNA projects, a pittance when compared to its mammoth cash pile. The company has the capacity to spend at least $150 billion on deals by the end of this year, BMO’s Seigerman wrote in an April note. But the dealmaking landscape has changed significantly since then, as interest rates shot up and inflation spooked credit markets. Global M&A volumes have slowed to a trickle: just one deal valued at more than $10 billion has been announced since June.
Then there’s the problem of what to buy. Pfizer executives have said they’re expecting to do enough deals to add some $25 billion in sales by 2030. They’ll have to do it without attracting too much attention from policymakers in Washington, where antitrust enforcers have been eyeing tougher merger rules to tackle concentration across industries.
Pfizer may be all-in on mRNA but that doesn’t mean they aren’t doing a lot of other things too. Its most promising drug candidates include a vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), which kills or hospitalizes more than 100,000 older adults each year in the US, as well as a therapy for obesity and diabetes, and autoimmune and cancer treatments. Though these potential blockbusters tend to get less airtime during investor presentations, and fewer questions, they are critical to Pfizer’s post-Covid growth story.
Still, the Covid market alone could keep bolstering Pfizer for several more years. Bourla has pledged that the company will continue to dominate the market with next-generation annual boosters, tailored to the latest variants. That market is shrinking. Uptake of the new Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna boosters is strikingly low, with only 2.7% of the eligible US population having received one of them as of Sept 28.,
BMO’s Seigerman still sees the potential for regular demand among over-50-year-olds, which in the US alone would be a $7 billion-plus annual market for Pfizer, a figure he described as “exciting to have on the balance sheet.”
“The question is for how many years?” he said. “There’s not a lot of optimism that market will fill out.” Demand for the updated Covid booster has been low, and analysts expect Pfizer’s overall revenue from the vaccine to start dropping sharply: from $33.2 billion this year to $10.5 billion in 2024.
For Pfizer, mRNA is unlikely to be a panacea. Even if it hits its ambitious drug development targets, persuades people to keep getting Covid shots and introduces a groundbreaking new flu or shingles vaccine, it’ll still have the same competitors, pricing pressures and regulatory hurdles it faced before.
“RNA is a fantastic platform, but it won’t solve everything, right?” said
(Updates with new data on booster shots in 38th paragraph.)
To contact the author of this story:
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
© 2022 Bloomberg L.P. All rights reserved. Used with permission.