A federal judge granted the electric car-maker’s motion to compel arbitration Dec. 11, saying the arbitration agreement in the worker’s employment contract covered this dispute.
The worker said the arbitration agreement was ambiguous, pointing to language preserving his right to file administrative charges with government agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. But that language wasn’t relevant to this lawsuit, which was based on New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act, the judge said.
Tesla has long required employees to sign arbitration agreements as a condition of being hired.
The worker said he was fired after discovering Tesla had a practice of selling “lemons” without proper disclosure and hiding “high-dollar, pre-delivery damage repairs” from consumers. He told his supervisors this was illegal and, in response, was demoted twice and then fired, he claims.
Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey wrote the decision.
Law Offices of Eric A. Shore PC represented the former employee. Littler Mendelson PC represented Tesla.
The case is Williams v. Tesla, Inc., 2018 BL 458034, D.N.J., No. 1:18-cv-04120-JHR-AMD, 12/11/18.
--with assistance from Dana Hull (Bloomberg News)
To read more from Daily Labor Report® pleaseOR Request Trial
(Updated with additional reporting.)