Daily Labor Report®

HR Buzz: Madison-Bound • Women at Helm • New Moms Urged to Exit?

April 26, 2019, 3:02 PM

The news isn’t all rosy for women: A researcher found that new moms can get a subtle message from their workplaces that they should consider bagging the outside job for now, and a science association delves into bias against women—especially of color—in leadership roles.

But on the bright side, women are doing well in some cities. You’ll find it all in this week’s HR Buzz.

You’ll Go a Long Way, Baby

Madison, Wis., was named the No. 1 U.S. city for women, for its low female unemployment rate (1.6 percent) and great work-life balance, among other things. Plano, Texas, was No. 2, striding up seven places from last year’s Smart Asset report.

This is the second year the financial technology company dug deeper into Census Bureau data on 100 U.S. cities to find out where women are seeing the most success.

Two Virginia cities made the top 10—Arlington, Va., scored the No. 3 slot, and Alexandria got No. 10. Seattle was No. 4, followed by Minneapolis and Durham, N.C. Arizona also had two top 10 cities—Chandler and Scottsdale were Nos. 7 and 8. Fremont, Calif., came in at No. 9.

The top 10 represent East and West coasts and both the North and South, the company noted. And all of the top 10 have well-educated populaces.

Overall, the fair sex has its lowest unemployment rate since 2000, and women business owners are 22 percent more numerous in the U.S. than five years ago.

Smart Asset looked at education, income, business ownership, work-life balance, cost of living, and low unemployment to arrive at its ratings.

Leadership Hurdles

Women, especially minority women, are underrepresented in leadership roles and often taken less seriously because of their gender or race. That’s the word from the Association of Women in Science, which says the problem is seen across all sectors.

AWIS released the preliminary results of a study, based on a survey of 125 of its women members, at its Innovation and Inclusion Summit April 24.

Eighty-three percent of respondents said they’d had their judgment questioned in their area of expertise; 82 percent said they had to work harder to get ahead; 72 percent have been assumed to be more junior than they are; and 70 percent said they’d had their accomplishments credited to others.

Women of color were 14 percent more likely than white women to be considered more junior, and 10 percent more likely to have their credit usurped, AWIS found.

Chief Research Officer Dr. Heather Metcalf said she wishes she could say she was surprised by the study results. “But this is what I study, and every time I give a presentation on my research I hear about all the different biases,” she said, adding: “The part of me that’s an idealist was disappointed but not surprised.”

AWIS also looked at data from other sources to see who’s getting ahead in STEM-related fields.

It found that 86 percent of people leading national labs are white men, with only 10 percent of directors being men of color, and white women bringing up the rear at 5 percent. No women of color are represented in the group. Meanwhile, women are underrepresented as CEOs of biotech IPOs as well. Six percent are white women, and just 2 percent are women of color.

Stay tuned for the full report by the end of May, according to Metcalf.

The group promises to have some recommendations on eliminating some of the barriers. AWIS advocates for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Expecting Less Encouragement?

Why do more women than men leave the workforce upon the arrival of a baby? Social theory has tended to put it on pregnant women opting out of the job and turning to new priorities, but a Florida State University researcher and her colleagues identified a “pushed out” factor.

Pregnant workers are in fact invested in their jobs and “strongly motivated to preserve their legitimacy at work,” FSU’s Samantha C. Paustian-Underdahl writes.

But pregnant women can perceive decreased career encouragement from their workplaces, possibly because of the implicit biases of co-workers. And that can dampen their own enthusiasm for returning, the researchers said.

That’s particularly important to remember as employers do a significant amount of hand-wringing over how best to retain women workers, they say.

Among the practical implications of the study, the authors say, is that managers should be aware of subtle biases and educate workers about them. They also can support pregnant employees by assigning them challenging long-term projects involving others.

Employers also could help new parents connect with other working parents at the company for mutual support and to learn about strategies and resources.

And expectant mothers should be made aware of the implicit bias that might be coming their way, so that they aren’t toppled by it. Pregnancy “is a pivotal time for the reevaluation of work and life roles,” the authors say.

Researchers followed male and female partners via six waves of online surveys starting from before the pregnancies were disclosed to employers. Participants completed the last surveys between weeks 30 and 35.

Co-researchers were Asia A. Eaton of Florida International University, Ashley Mandeville at Florida Gulf Coast University, and Laura M. Little at the University of Georgia.

The study was published in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

To contact the reporter on this story: Cathleen O'Connor Schoultz in Washington at cschoultz@bloomberglaw.com

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Cynthia Harasty at charasty@bloomberglaw.com; Martha Mueller Neff at mmuellerneff@bloomberglaw.com

To read more articles log in. To learn more about a subscription click here.