The lead plaintiff didn’t sufficiently allege he’d be harmed again by T-Mobile’s conduct, Judge M. James Lorenz wrote for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.
The Ninth Circuit has held that a single incident is insufficient to establish a likelihood of future injury.
The court gave him 21 days to amend his complaint to address its concerns.
Patrick Ames sued T-Mobile under California consumer law after he gave the company ...